you're reading...
Teaching and Learning, Uncategorized

Exploring Barak Rosenshine’s seminal Principles of Instruction: Why it is THE must-read for all teachers.

This post is based on a talk I gave at ResearchEd in Rugby.  The paper in question is Barak Rosenshine’s Principles of Instruction published in American Educator in 2012, downloadable in full as a pdf here:

I first came across if after seeing Oliver Caviglioli’s superb graphic summary for How2 – available here:

My admiration for Rosenshine is largely informed by my experience working with teachers in various schools and colleges where I’ve been trying to engage people with research in order to support them to improve their practice.  For me, it is the best, most clear and comprehensive guide to evidence-informed teaching there is.

Here are some of the reasons:

  • It resonates for teachers of all subjects and contexts – because it focuses on aspects of teaching that are pretty much universal:  questioning, practice, building knowledge.   There are good examples from English and Maths lessons but other teachers could easily extrapolate to their own subject specific issues.
  • It makes direct links from research to practice – each of the 10 sections are written in two parts: Research Findings and then In The ClassRoom.   The paper is fully referenced for future follow-up.
  • It does an excellent job in helping teachers to link practice to cognitive psychology, supporting the formation of a sound theory of action – that mental model teachers need providing a link between their actions and the learning process. There are multiple explanatory references to ideas about memory and cognitive load theory. For each practical strategy, there is an underpinning model based in evidence.
  • It has teacher-centred authenticity- it feels like Rosenshine knows what really goes on. The research is often based on linking classroom observations to student outcomes, and the examples given show a strong understanding of the real things teachers do.
  • The simple language comparing ‘teachers who were more effective or more successful’ with ‘teachers who were less successful’ is persuasive.  It’s not as crude as saying ‘good vs bad’ – the language lays a path to improvement from less successful to more successful.  Who wouldn’t want to be in the group of  ‘more effective teachers’?!  The tone of the article feels helpful rather than judgemental – which is pretty hard to achieve.
  • There are four very clear strands that run through the 10 sections – reviewing material, questioning, explaining and modelling, practice.  Each of one these can be a focus areas for improvement so there are multiple ways to engage with the ideas and to find a focus for deliberate practice.

Interestingly, within the document, Barak Rosenshine offers a further list of 17 principles  that overlap and flesh out the 10 sections.  It’s a good simple summary of the whole document.  However, as I stress continually, summaries are meant as a prompt – you really need to read the whole thing; it’s packed with insights and it warrants multiple close readings.

Screen Shot 2018-06-10 at 09.31.43

I find that, in exploring the document with teachers, it helps to break it down into the four strands (NB these are strands that I am suggesting, not Rosenshine.)

Reviewing material: 


Daily review is important in helping to resurface prior learning from the last lesson -let’s not be surprised that students don’t immediately remember everything. They won’t! It’s a powerful technique for building fluency and confidence and it’s especially important if we’re about to introduce new learning – to active relevant prior learning in working memory.

Weekly and monthly review is about longer-term retrieval practice – to continue the process of building long-term memory to support future learning.



These two sections are brilliant. The main message I always stress is summarised in the mantra: ask more questions to more students in more depth.  Rosenshine gives lots of great examples of the types of questions teachers can ask.  He also reinforces the importance of process questions – we need ask how students worked things out, not just get answers.  He is also really good on stressing that asking questions is about getting feedback to us as teachers about how well we’ve taught the material and about the need to check understanding to ensure misconceptions are flushed out and tackled.

Sequencing Concepts and modelling 


The three stages give a superb guide to how to sequence knowledge.

  • Small steps – with practice at each stage.  We need to break down our concepts and procedures (like multi-stage maths problems or writing) into small steps that each be practised.
  • Models – including the importance of the worked-example effect to reduce cognitive load.  We need to give many worked examples; too often teacher give too few.
  • Scaffolding is needed to develop expertise – a form of mastery coaching, where cognitive supports are given – such as how to structure extended writing – but they are gradually withdrawn.  The sequencing is key.  Stabilisers on a bike are really powerful aids to the learning and confidence building- but eventually they need to come off.

Stages of Practice


I haven’t read a better explanation of the difference between guided and independent practice.  They are both vital.

  • Teachers needs to be up close to students’ initial attempts making sure that they are building confidence and making too many errors.  This is a common weakness with ‘less effective teachers’.   Guided practice requires close supervision and feedback.
  • High success rate – in questioning and practice – is important. Rosenshine suggests the optimum is 80%.  ie – high! Not 95-100% (too easy).  He even suggests 70% is too low… (although, in my only quibble with the paper, I would be cautious about getting to worried about the precision here.)
  • Independent, monitored practice.  Successful teachers make time for students to the things they’ve been taught by themselves… when they’re ready.   “Students need extensive, successful, independent practice in order for skills and knowledge to become automatic”

Rosenshine concludes the paper by discussing their research process, combining a range sources of evidence.  He suggests:

“Even though these principles come from three different sources…….ideas from each of the sources overlap and add to each other. This overlap gives us faith that we are developing a valid and research-based understanding of the art of teaching.”

and finally….

My final messages about engaging with this paper are:

  1. Don’t turn it into a checklist.  It’s a guide for professional learning – not a ticklist for accountability freaks! Don’t kill it!!! Please!!!
  2. Take time to explore the implications at a subject-specific level.  The ideas of practice, modelling, questioning… each have meaning only in the context of curriculum content.  The principles need to be articulated in context, in situ…

Thanks to Barak for giving us this gift – and to Oliver for bringing it to my attention!

This blog by Mark Enser is a superb example of putting Rosenshine’s principles into practice –  in this case, his subject is Geography.  https://heathfieldteachshare.wordpress.com/2018/04/23/putting-theory-into-practice/

Update: Oliver Caviglioli has now produced a new poster using this blog as a basis – reorganising the 10 principles into four themes.


This is really interesting – the original material that later featured in American Educator is here: https://www.iaoed.org/downloads/EdPractices_21.pdf

Screen Shot 2018-12-13 at 11.11.00.png


Here is a video of me giving my ResearchEd Talk in Haninge, Sweden, recorded for Swedish TV


And here’s the man himself….


68 thoughts on “Exploring Barak Rosenshine’s seminal Principles of Instruction: Why it is THE must-read for all teachers.

  1. Beautiful piece of work Tom…thank you. I share your weekly posts with my colleagues and am thankful Tom Barrett linked me to your site. This post offers many affirmations and provocations for us all. It will form the basis of much collaborative discussion.

    Liked by 2 people

    Posted by Louise Dungate | June 10, 2018, 9:53 pm
  2. Yes, this is a superb article, and thoroughly deserves highlighting!


    Posted by fieldsofthemindeducation | June 11, 2018, 8:11 am
  3. Many thanks for this excellent post Tom. EdCentral has just published a ‘Beginner’s Guide’ to Rosenshine. We have quoted you within it an included a link to this piece.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by Louise Holmes | July 19, 2018, 6:15 pm
  4. A mental model of learning: the perfect companion to Rosenshine’s principles.

    Many thanks for the re-ordering of the principles. We have been using Rosenshine’s paper to support our ITT students in making sense of the observations they do of experienced teachers. It has been invaluable in helping novices quickly into a professional conversation. Equally useful as a companion to those conversations is a portable mental model of learning so that the principles can be related to what is known from research about learning processes. I favour the Science of Learning framework as succinctly explained by Howard-Jones et al (2018) in the Spring 2018 edition of Impact. This can be found on https://impact.chartered.college/article/howard-jones-applying-science-learning-classroom/

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by Chris Tay | December 4, 2018, 11:34 am
  5. Great article.


    Posted by David Russell, CEO of the ETF | March 18, 2019, 5:39 pm
  6. Reblogged this on Longsands LPD.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by longsandscpd | June 21, 2019, 3:18 pm
  7. Great article. Will try to weave all into my teaching in the new term.


    Posted by LeePing Wong | June 28, 2019, 4:34 pm
  8. Thanks so much for your summary. Yes, teachers need to be up close to help students avoid making too many mistakes – so important that it’s worth writing correctly, hope you don’t mind me proof reading?

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by caroleclohesy | September 6, 2019, 7:53 am


  1. Pingback: Blog of the week – Farnham Heath End School Teaching & Learning Hub - June 15, 2018

  2. Pingback: ‘Principles of Instruction’ – Teaching and Learning at The John Warner School - June 28, 2018

  3. Pingback: 10 essential discussions to have in any teacher team. | teacherhead - July 17, 2018

  4. Pingback: 10 essential discussions to have in any teacher team. | Kesgrave High School - July 18, 2018

  5. Pingback: Quizlet Ambassador – Mr Harrison CS - July 30, 2018

  6. Pingback: Great Teaching: The Power of Questioning | teacherhead - August 24, 2018

  7. Pingback: Blog of the Week – DGGSCPD - August 24, 2018

  8. Pingback: Blog of the Week – DGGS CPD - August 28, 2018

  9. Pingback: Exploring the key ideas and implications of Rosenshine’s Principles of Instruction - September 3, 2018

  10. Pingback: Great Teaching: The Power of Questioning – Teaching & Learning @ CCHS - September 8, 2018

  11. Pingback: Great Teaching. The Power of Practice | teacherhead - September 9, 2018

  12. Pingback: B. Rosenshine Principles- Ten Principles in a Thread. – NewToThePost - September 22, 2018

  13. Pingback: Ten Principles of Instruction- Rosenshine, B. (2012) Explained from a classroom. – NewToThePost - September 22, 2018

  14. Pingback: Lesson plans and planning lessons – a view through different eyes - October 7, 2018

  15. Pingback: Rosenshine Re-ordered. A Poster by @olicav | teacherhead - October 19, 2018

  16. Pingback: @teacherhead Update #1. October ’18. | teacherhead - October 27, 2018

  17. Pingback: Direct Instruction, Cognitive Load, Rosenshine, Desirable Difficulties and Responsive Teaching (and thanks to @Tom_Needham_) | mrbenney - November 5, 2018

  18. Pingback: 10 reasons lessons can be less effective than they could be: | teacherhead - December 1, 2018

  19. Pingback: Teaching for Recall, Fluency and Understanding: Blog round-up for easy access. | teacherhead - December 6, 2018

  20. Pingback: Bounce – Note #1 – Malcolm Drakes's Blog - December 8, 2018

  21. Pingback: Global profession. Global message. | teacherhead - December 12, 2018

  22. Pingback: The Roots of Rosenshine’s Principles. | teacherhead - December 14, 2018

  23. Pingback: Recall: What Is It Good For? (Absolutely Loads Of Things) – The Teaching Booth - January 3, 2019

  24. Pingback: Ramble #6 Achieving coherence in primary science (Why primary Science needs to be less like the Simpsons and more like Game of Thrones) – Mr Almond: Nuts About Teaching - January 4, 2019

  25. Pingback: Blog of the Month – DGGS CPD - January 23, 2019

  26. Pingback: Recommending research for Teaching & Learning … – Love To Teach - February 3, 2019

  27. Pingback: ResearchED Haninge 9/2 | Utveckling mot nya mål - February 9, 2019

  28. Pingback: A to Z of Cognitive Science – Teaching & Learning Toolbox for Research Informed Education - March 15, 2019

  29. Pingback: Rosenshine – practical examples! | Kesgrave High School - March 18, 2019

  30. Pingback: The Power of the Gaze in AQA’s Power and Conflict Poetry: PART 1 – Birmingham Teacher - March 31, 2019

  31. Pingback: Riding the Rosenshine Wave. | teacherhead - May 26, 2019

  32. Pingback: Rosenshine’s Principles: a must-read for teachers? – RogerHiggins - June 2, 2019

  33. Pingback: ‘You drilled it into us!’ | Mrslh RE teaching - June 8, 2019

  34. Pingback: Rosenshine’s Principles in Action | CHS Teaching & Learning News - June 19, 2019

  35. Pingback: Leading Change as a Subject Leader: Improving curriculum for enduringly great teaching – How then should we teach? - June 29, 2019

  36. Pingback: Learning and Schools - July 10, 2019

  37. Pingback: Ideas for better teaching. @teacherhead blog collection. | teacherhead - July 24, 2019

  38. Pingback: Teachers can only improve themselves. But how? | teacherhead - August 17, 2019

  39. Pingback: Are Rosenshine’s Principles “just common sense”? #rED19 | teacherhead - September 8, 2019

  40. Pingback: The best list of research links – brilliant! | Kesgrave High School - September 13, 2019

  41. Pingback: Masters Research Feeds into Feedback Changes at Cedars – Research-Informed Teaching - November 19, 2019

  42. Pingback: Ouch: medicalised words in education – Birmingham Teacher - December 23, 2019

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow teacherhead on WordPress.com


Blog Stats

  • 7,183,840 hits


Follow me on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 127,100 other followers

St Jude Songs. And others.

%d bloggers like this: