
I’m preparing a CPD input for teachers at my school sharing some of my current thoughts about teaching. One of the ideas I want to share comes from Ron Berger – and I got this mainly from David Didau and this post here: http://www.learningspy.co.uk/assessment/improving-peer-feedback-with-public-critique/
The video by Ron Berger, as featured in David’s post, is worth watching, even if getting a first grade class to ‘look like a scientist’ doesn’t feel too close to what you do in your lessons. :
I always love the boy early on, bursting with conviction in his knowledge: “It’s a Tiger Swallow Tail”; “I knew it!!..”
There are lots of things to take from this video:
1) The nature of effective critique. Most obviously, Ron is showing that critique that is kind, helpful and very specific, focused on a well-defined outcome is immensely powerful. He is also showing that children can learn to do this. Austin improved his butterfly based on feedback from his peers. David explains this in detail in his excellent post.
Lesson: It pays to give feedback in this fashion as teacher but also to teach students how to give feedback. Not only does it help the recipient, it helps them to crystallise their understanding of what success looks like. Let’s teach critique better and use it more.
2) The value of re-drafting. Imagine if the teacher had just left it at draft one! Or even number three? There was more to come from Austin but he could have been allowed to stop short, to move on to something else before he’d fully explored this particular process. How often do we do that? I’d suggest that too often we accept work from a student that is mediocre..far short of their best…and don’t enable them or insist that they go further. Re-drafting or, more generally, improving work is under-rated. Austin found out that he could draw a superb butterfly; the teacher found out that he could too – because he was given time and space to continually improve. In fact he went back a bit in order to move forward… that was part of the process.
Obviously, with that experience or real success, you’d hope he could achieve a higher standard within fewer re-drafts on his next effort. However, if he’d only done draft one or two of the butterfly, he’d have had a weaker platform of experience from which to base future work on.
Lesson: Let’s not accept mediocre efforts and move on. Perhaps, as part of an approach to differentiation, some of our students could benefit from doing fewer pieces of work..with more time to re-draft selected samples of work until it is absolutely brilliant. That would give them the experience of success as well as a message about standards and expectations. If we settle for mediocrity, can we ever expect those students to dazzle?
3) The growth-mindset aspect. The thing that strikes me most about this video is the contrast between Austin’s first and last drafts and the way that changes your perception of this unknown first-grader. Presented with the first draft.. you might think that that was what Austin could do; that was him. Presented with the final draft, you’d think he was a very much more talented young boy. But it is the same boy… the final draft was always in him; it just needed to find a way out – with some help from his friends.
How often do we pigeon-hole students, fixing them into a category of attainment and more or less expecting their work to reinforce that pre-determined view? Do we challenge students enough when they hand in mediocre work and say ‘no – you are capable of so much more than that..let’s see what else you can do?’ I think that too often, we allow students to under-sell themselves; and so they do.
Lesson: Let’s’ think about the possibility that every student is a possible Austin. With some judicious feedback, could we be getting Tiger Swallow Tails drawn like a scientist from each of them instead of the infantile sketches of a first grader? Let’s challenge our early impressions of students and give them more time to produce work of the highest quality..so they know what it feels like; so they get that sense of achievement and get a taste for more.
I am no expert on critique per se but there are lots of people who are. As has been pointed out to me today, with thanks to Tait Coles, Darren Mead, David Fawcett and Martin Said, there are some superb blogs and documents about critique and feedback. David has compiled them at the end of this excellent post:
http://reflectionsofmyteaching.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/creating-culture-of-critique.html
I thoroughly recommend reading the post and following all the links at the bottom.
Update. Did Austin Learn Anything?
I always pose this question as a follow-up in any CPD? Why? Because we need to deal with the possibility that, some time later, Austin might not remember how to ‘look like a scientist’. His butterflies of the future might revert back to his more basic offerings? This might be because he was too reliant on the critique feedback and that later, left to his own devices, he wouldn’t have been able to self-assess and make the changes needed to match the standard he showed in Mr Berger’s lesson. This is ‘satnav’ syndrome – where we just follow instructions without thinking too hard for ourselves. We reach the destination without learning the route.
To avoid this it would be essential for Austin to be given opportunities later on to capitalise on his new-found sense of self as someone capable of excellence, by trying a similar activity by himself – without all the help. If he can produce the same standard of work independently, some time later, then we might say he’s truly learned something.
Further Update: Ron’s message!
I just received this message from Ron himself, with a link to his excellent website.

Reblogged this on paddington teaching and learning and commented:
The power of specific feedback and re-drafts – a must-watch!
LikeLike
Excellent webinar by Grant Wiggins on feedback (and the difference between it and evaluation and advice) here http://pages.turnitin.com/WC_102813_Recording.html?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRolv6TJZKXonjHpfsX54%2B8sWK63i4kz2EFye%2BLIHETpodcMScBlPK%2BTFAwTG5toziV8R7nCJM1s0dkQWRHh
LikeLike
[…] see this in practice, Tom Sherrington wrote earlier this week on some of Berger’s techniques, while David Didau has explored employing […]
LikeLike
[…] learning. Please take the time to read Tom’s post on ”Austin’s Butterfly” here. You simply must take the time to watch the video […]
LikeLike
[…] and expectations of them fall. Their expectations of themselves also fall. In a recent post about Ron Berger’s critique method, I have suggested that a message from Austin’s Butterfly is that, too often, we accept work […]
LikeLike
[…] excellent blog posts I read last week: Alex Quigley’s – here – and Tom Sherrington’s – here. Both posts discussed Ron Berger’s ‘ethic of excellence‘, pointing out the incredible […]
LikeLike
[…] the curriculum. As Tom Sherrington urged us in a recent blogpost on the importance of clarity to ‘define the butterfly’, so we must define the threshold concepts in our own disciplines, and […]
LikeLike
[…] Sherrington’s (@headguruteacher) post , “Lessons from Berger: Austin’s Butterfly and Not Accepting Mediocrity” about an ethic of excellence and mastery learning just blew me away – check out the YouTube […]
LikeLike
[…] has a big impact Tom Sherrington posted recently, discussing a video of Ron Berger’s, which demonstrates the power of redrafting […]
LikeLike
[…] is being challenged and supported appropriately. Ron Berger’s Ethic of Excellence and the Austin’s Butterfly story help to think about these ideas; the idea that we settle for too little from students when, with […]
LikeLike
[…] available provide us with ways of giving feedback during the drafting of work. As with the tale of Austin’s Butterfly, constructive feedback and redrafting are massively powerful in leading learners to excellence. […]
LikeLike
[…] Ron Berger ‘Austin’s Butterfly’ story helps to think about what standards are and provides food for thought about whether we […]
LikeLike
[…] better example of this process in action that Austin’s Butterfly, also blogged about by Tom here, and demonstrated by Ron Berger himself […]
LikeLike
[…] get a few things sorted out. Daniel is always just below the top level. Why is that? Is this an Austin’s Butterfly effect? Maybe he needs to do some re-drafting and I need to absolutely insist that he does it again and […]
LikeLike
[…] In the above including reference to a post by @headguruteacher that everyone should see here […]
LikeLike
[…] approach, as in Ron Berger’s ‘Austin’s Butterfly’ video…as described in this post – using the feedback process to challenge mediocrity and focus on the […]
LikeLike
[…] some students will produce low quality outcomes, below the standards they are capable of reaching (cue Austin’s Butterfly…). However, the major learning comes from having to solve problems and make choices using […]
LikeLike
[…] think about the most recent piece of work you collected in for marking. Here are your Austin’s Butterflies. Are you going to be less demanding of some students than others? How far will you go to secure […]
LikeLike
[…] Lessons from Berger: Austin’s Butterfly and not accepting mediocrity […]
LikeLike
[…] be referring to Austin’s Butterfly a lot – as I have done in a couple of blog posts here and […]
LikeLike
[…] I’ll be referring to Austin’s Butterfly a lot – as I have done in a couple of blog posts here and […]
LikeLike
Reblogged this on teachaldenham and commented:
Ideas from Tom Sherrington @headguruteacher on peer assessment through Austin’s Butterfly.
LikeLike
[…] a few things sorted out. Daniel is always just below the top level. Why is that? Is this an Austin’s Butterfly effect? Maybe he needs to do some re-drafting and I need to absolutely insist that he does it again and […]
LikeLike
[…] Which butterfly do the mock exams represent for you? Source […]
LikeLike
[…] Read more about it here. […]
LikeLike
[…] Tom Sherrington: Lessons from Berger […]
LikeLike
[…] and how do we achieve it? How can we take the secretarial out of excellence? You may have heard of Ron Berger and Austin’s Butterflies, showing the stages a boy goes through to create an excellent drawing of a butterfly. It’s an […]
LikeLike
[…] they are capable of, building their self-esteem and honing their writing skills. It is more like Austin’s butterfly than a high-stakes C-making […]
LikeLike
[…] Read Tom’s post here. […]
LikeLike
[…] Sherrington’s (@headguruteacher) post , “Lessons from Berger: Austin’s Butterfly and Not Accepting Mediocrity” about an ethic of excellence and mastery learning just blew me away – check out the YouTube […]
LikeLike
[…] Please click here to find out more about Ron Berger’s work. It is so interesting and something we must all consider when teaching. Austin’s Butterfly […]
LikeLike
[…] one piece of beautiful work per subject per year as a way of ensuring all of our students have the Austin’s Butterfly excellence […]
LikeLike
[…] Revisit Austin’s Butterfly: http://headguruteacher.com/2013/11/05/lesson-from-berger-austins-butterfly-and-not-accepting-mediocr… […]
LikeLike
[…] Revisit Austin’s Butterfly: http://headguruteacher.com/2013/11/05/lesson-from-berger-austins-butterfly-and-not-accepting-mediocr… […]
LikeLike
[…] Austin’s ButterflyClick Here To View Austin’s Butterfly Earth Week […]
LikeLike
[…] the same time, I was reading several blog posts (Tom Sherrington; David Fawcett; Harry Fletcher-Wood) effusing praise for Ron Berger’s work around […]
LikeLike
[…] the same time, I was reading several blog posts (Tom Sherrington; David Fawcett; Harry Fletcher-Wood) effusing praise for Ron Berger’s work around […]
LikeLike
[…] for staff, a (no) marking policy in the English Dept, Growth Mindset in maths, Secret Buddies, Austin’s butterfly, more Lemov, Whole-class mock-marking, STEM club, Google forms, flipped learning, book reviews… […]
LikeLike
[…] Lessons from Berger: Austins’ butterfly and not accepting mediocrity […]
LikeLike
[…] taking something from Austin’s Butterfly, try to create space in your curriculum planning to go the whole hog on redrafting so that students […]
LikeLike
[…] Lessons from Berger: Austin’s Butterfly and not accepting mediocrity […]
LikeLike
[…] taking something from Austin’s Butterfly, try to create space in your curriculum planning to go the whole hog on redrafting so that students […]
LikeLike
[…] think I first came across Berger’s “Austin’s Butterfly” in this blog post by Tom Sherrington. In the years since I have read Berger’s An Ethic of Excellence for myself […]
LikeLike
[…] taking something from Austin’s Butterfly, try to create space in your curriculum planning to go the whole hog on redrafting so that students […]
LikeLike
[…] Understand the power of feedback via Berger’s Butterfly […]
LikeLiked by 1 person
[…] And of course, students need teachers to give them time and opportunities to improve, to experience success… or as Ron Berger would say, to get ‘a taste of excellence’ – Austin’s Butterfly style. Lessons from Berger: Austin’s Butterfly and not accepting mediocrity […]
LikeLike
[…] Ron Berger illustrates in the classic Austin’s Butterfly video, involving students in processes such as peer critique, supports them to develop a sense of […]
LikeLike
Beautifully expressed
LikeLike