you're reading...
Leadership Issues, Teaching and Learning, Uncategorized

What is a knowledge-rich curriculum? Principle and Practice.

I have found recent discussions and debates about the concept of a ‘knowledge-rich curriculum’  – or knowledge-led; knowledge-based – fascinating.   Some of this has been explored brilliantly in various blogs.  Here is a selection:

There are also numerous blogs from Michael Fordham (Knowledge and curriculum – Clio et cetera), Clare Sealy (Memory not memories – teaching for long term learning – primarytimerydotcom) or Christine Counsell: the dignity of the thing

Along with plenty of others, I initially struggled to get my ahead around this idea.  As a science teacher I’ve always felt my curriculum was packed with knowledge and, without question, I’ve seen numerous cohorts sit lots of GCSE exams year after year, each requiring significant knowledge.   However, having engaged in the debate, read Martin Robinson’s Trivium 21c and Dan Willingham’s work, I’m increasingly convinced that a knowledge-rich/focused/led/based curriculum is an important concept that we ought to embrace.

Based on my work with lots of schools in varying circumstances over the last few years, I would say that not only is this approach often different to the default practice, it offers a secure route to the rising standards that we’re continually seeking.

What is a knowledge-rich curriculum in principle?

Based on various ideas pulled from the blogs and books cited above, I would suggest there are four components:

Knowledge provides a driving, underpinning philosophy:  The grammar of each subject is given high status; the specifics of what we want students to learn matter and the traditions of subject disciplines are respected.  Skills and understanding are seen as forms of knowledge and it is understood that there are no real generic skills that can be taught outside of specific knowledge domains.  Acquiring powerful knowledge is seen as an end itself; there is a belief that we are all empowered through knowing things and that this cannot be left to chance.  There is also a sense that the creative, ’rounded and grounded’ citizens we all want to develop – with a host of strong character traits –  will emerge through being immersed in a knowledge-rich curriculum.

The knowledge content is specified in detail: Units of work are supported by statements that detail the knowledge to be learned – something that can be written down.  We do not merely want to ‘do the Romans’; we want children to gain some specified knowledge of the Romans as well as a broad overview.  We want children to know specific things about plants and about The Amazon Rainforest, WWII, Romeo and Juliet and Climate Change.  We want children to have more than a general sense of things through vaguely remembered  knowledge encounters; in addition to a range of experiences from which important tacit knowledge is gained, we want them to amass a specific body of declarative and procedural knowledge that is planned.   This runs through every phase of school: units of work are not defined by headings but by details: eg beyond ‘environmental impact of fossil fuels’, the specific impacts are detailed; beyond ‘changes to transport in Victorian Britain’, specific changes are listed.

Knowledge is taught to be remembered, not merely encountered: A good knowledge-rich curriculum embraces learning from cognitive science about memory, forgetting and the power of retrieval practice.  Our curriculum is not simply a set of encounters from which children form ad hoc memories; it is designed to be remembered in detail; to be stored in our students’ long-term memories so that they can later build on it forming ever wider and deeper schema.  This requires approaches to curriculum planning and delivery that build in spaced retrieval practice, formative low-stakes testing and plenty of repeated practice for automaticity and fluency.

Knowledge is sequenced and mapped deliberately and coherently: Beyond the knowledge specified for each unit, a knowledge-rich curriculum is planned vertically and horizontally giving thought to the optimum knowledge sequence for building secure schema – a kinetic model for materials; a timeline for historical events; a sense of the canon in literature; a sense of place; a framework for understanding cultural diversity and human development and evolution.  Attention is also given to known misconceptions and there is an understanding of the instructional tools needed to move students from novice to expert in various subject domains.


What is a knowledge-rich curriculum in practice?

The best way to attack this is through some examples:

Exhibit A: The Romans 

Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 06.25.46

If you imagine some Year 8s looking back to their time in Year 4, when they ‘did the Romans’, what would we want them to remember?  They might remember their trip to the ruins or the museum, the video of the gladiators and something about togas and what the soldiers looked like.  They might have a general sense that Romans had an empire and that they were around a long time ago.  In a knowledge-rich curriculum they would remember all of this but would also be expected to know the terms empire, emperor, centurion, amphitheatre, aqueduct.  They would know who Julius Caesar was; they would know a set of dates, placing the Romans in time in relation to Jesus and 1066 and be able to identify the location of key Roman sites in the UK and Europe.

All of the teaching could be supported by giving students a knowledge organiser with all the key facts on it from which various quizzes and tests are derived to support their retrieval practice.  This would be part of a long-term plan that ensured students returned to Roman history beyond Year 4; there would be an expectation that their knowledge would be built on, not left behind.

Exhibit B: Parliament Hill Science 

At this Camden school, the science department has developed a superb set of resources to support students with learning.  This is linked to their FACE It approach described in this post: FACE It. A formula for learning.   The idea is that students need to master the recall of basic science facts and concepts on the road to deep understanding and the ability to apply knowledge to problem solving.   They are provided with excellent study guides; more detailed than a knowledge organiser but stripped down from what might be in a text-book. Here’s a sample from the GCSE unit on genetics and selection.

Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 22.44.11

Significantly, students are shown the quizzes that will be used to test them on their knowledge. They are embedded in the books.  They are seen in advance so that students can learn the form in which knowledge is sometimes expressed.  It guides their learning. Students are asked to learn the material after being taught it and then take the quizzes without any study aids.  The aim is that all students get all the questions right.  That’s the point.  Their theory is that, if students can’t get the simple factual recall questions right, they have no chance of then getting the ‘application to new contexts’ questions right.

Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 22.43.40

This embedded quizzing teachers lower attaining students to build confidence, gaining important study skills and has paid dividends.  It also helps a team of teachers to focus their energies and to plan collaboratively.  It’s a Godsend for any new or non-specialist teachers too.

Exhibit C:  Trial by Ordeal

If you were teaching the GCSE History theme study on Crime and Punishment, you might show this BBC Bitesize video: https://www.bbc.com/education/clips/zrtk2hv.  It’s a great colourful story full of information, examples, facts, concepts, gory details.  You could watch it and have a wonderful engaging discussion during a lesson.  But…. some days and weeks later, what would students remember?  If you hoped students would recall as much as possible simply through absorbing information or by making their own notes, you’re going to get a wide range of responses – and for certain, the weakest students will have the worst notes and, in all likelihood, the lowest level of recall.  It’s not enough.

In a knowledge-rich approach, we don’t leave this to chance.  We spell it all out. Alongside watching the video and having the discussion, we make the note-making absolutely explicit.  These are the key facts; this what everyone must know; this is what you must all remember.  Not only this, but at least all of this:

Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 17.46.04

You might choose to train students to produce their own structured notes in a quizzable format or you might just give them the notes and focus on the retrieval practice and application.  But what you won’t do is all students to scrabble around dredging memories for half-remembered titbits of facts in the hope that they have a coherent picture of the idea of trial by ordeal.  You control it; you are precise about it.

Exhibit D:  Sequenced knowledge of Motors. 

Screen Shot 2018-06-05 at 17.47.14

This is my favourite bit of teaching physics – one of them at least.  If I teach this through a  knowledge-rich approach I want to make sure that the knowledge builds securely.  Firstly, say in Year 8, through demos and practicals, I want students to build their tacit knowledge of the key phenomena:  magnetism, magnetic fields, attraction and repulsion, the idea of ‘strength’ of a magnet;  forces; current in circuits – each with direction and magnitude; the idea that phenomena interact. All of this can be highly qualitative – simply focusing on changes of direction and the simple awe and wonder thing that motors work at all in our universe. I will also secure recall and understanding of some key terminology.

Later, as part of a spiral curriculum, avoiding cognitive overload and building on prior knowledge, I need students to understand and use F = BIL and Fleming’s left hand rule.  I need them to know the terms, that magnetic flux density more or less means ‘strength’, has a symbol B and units Teslas.  I need them to learn the equation by heart and practise using it and manipulating it.  All of that needs focus – so that they think about the equation away from the buzzy distraction of a sparking, whizzing motor.  I build the sequence carefully, deliberately with a focus on practice and recall and schema-building.

Is this new? Well, yes I think it is to many teachers and in many schools –  especially once the cogscience combines with the idea of subject grammar.  It’s way beyond some reductive idea of rote learning and regurgitating facts for no purpose.   It’s about ensuring students always have a secure knowledge platform allowing them to reach the next level.  But it’s not too important (is it?) whether we did this before… some of us will; some won’t and that will depend on context, subject, phase…   The point is that we do it now.  It’s actually rather exciting….


Since posting this, Debra Kidd has extended/deepened the ideas here in this superb post. Knowledge is just the start….    https://debrakidd.wordpress.com/2018/06/11/a-rich-curriculum/.   Read together, I think we’ve nailed it!

Another Update

This post by Michael Fordham makes perfect sense to me:  https://clioetcetera.com/2018/06/12/is-it-more-important-to-understand-than-to-know/ Understanding is really about what we know… the knowledge.  Now we’ve nailed it.



45 thoughts on “What is a knowledge-rich curriculum? Principle and Practice.

  1. Reblogged this on DT & Engineering Teaching Resources and commented:
    What is a knowledge-rich curriculum? Principle and Practice.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by DT & Engineering Teaching Resources | June 6, 2018, 10:24 am
  2. Great blog. Good points. Appreciates that it’s not new but that the newly explicit emphasis is of considerable value.
    Lower case t for tesla (from my knowledge-based curriculum of the early 1980s) 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by dodiscimus | June 6, 2018, 8:17 pm
  3. Reblogged this on kadir kozan.


    Posted by kadir kozan | June 7, 2018, 7:12 am
  4. Reblogged this on THE CHA WEEKLY READER and commented:
    What exactly is a knowledge-rich/based/led curriculum? Don’t all curricular teach knowledge? This post by Tom Sherrington explains the principles with useful examples and links to some great follow-up reading.

    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by Adam Porter | June 7, 2018, 2:38 pm
  5. Reblogged this on .


    Posted by longsandscpd | June 8, 2018, 9:36 am
  6. Just be careful not to kill the curiosity of the children involved; don’t just ‘do’ their education to them. We emphasise this by ensuring the curriculum is expressed as a series of questions, mapped undernath by the content required.


    Posted by jameswilding | June 24, 2018, 7:53 am
  7. Im so happy to read this. I’ve felt a little bit like a rebellious outcast for a while now because I believed in exactly the principles detailed here. You’re right, it is new for most teachers and I think this is because of the indoctrination that we go through in initial teacher training. I’d love to hear about ITT institutions that preach knolwedge rich teaching.


    Liked by 1 person

    Posted by teachinginthenude | November 20, 2018, 8:05 pm
  8. Reblogged this on Ridings Educational.


    Posted by Ridings Educational | February 11, 2019, 12:57 pm
  9. Dear Tom,
    So you say you build tacit knowledge FIRST – by the first contact with the physics ? OR would you build explicit Knowledge UPFRONT to gave them the chance to connect what the they observe in the experiments with the declarative knowledge you explained upfront???
    Greetings Renate


    Posted by Renate Jackson | October 25, 2019, 10:25 am


  1. Pingback: Blog of the week – Farnham Heath End School Teaching & Learning Hub - June 8, 2018

  2. Pingback: A Rich Curriculum – Love Learning…. - June 11, 2018

  3. Pingback: Why the right don’t need to dominate the discussion on curriculum. Dead, white men and more. – streamlinedsendco.com - June 13, 2018

  4. Pingback: Teaching and Learning Bulletin – Issue 20 | Buckinghamshire Learning Trust - June 15, 2018

  5. Pingback: First blog post – streamlinedsendco.com - June 16, 2018

  6. Pingback: Curriculum, Teaching and Assessment | Class Teaching - June 19, 2018

  7. Pingback: The Knowledge-Rich Curriculum – Thinking education - June 20, 2018

  8. Pingback: Get Into Teaching. The best job going. | teacherhead - July 13, 2018

  9. Pingback: 10 essential discussions to have in any teacher team. | teacherhead - July 17, 2018

  10. Pingback: 10 essential discussions to have in any teacher team. | Kesgrave High School - July 18, 2018

  11. Pingback: How not to implement your brilliant updated curriculum | Mixed Results - August 2, 2018

  12. Pingback: Blog of the Week – DGGSCPD - August 24, 2018

  13. Pingback: Blog of the Week – DGGS CPD - August 28, 2018

  14. Pingback: Knowledge has an image problem in Australian education - September 28, 2018

  15. Pingback: Global profession. Global message. | teacherhead - December 12, 2018

  16. Pingback: Blog of the Month – DGGS CPD - January 23, 2019

  17. Pingback: What is a knowledge-rich curriculum? Principle and Practice. Tom Sherrington – teachingandlearningblog - January 29, 2019

  18. Pingback: What is a knowledge-rich curriculum? Principle and Practice. | Kesgrave High School - January 30, 2019

  19. Pingback: Curriculum roundup 2019 | missdcoxblog - February 24, 2019

  20. Pingback: Thinking About Curriculum | Class Teaching - March 22, 2019

  21. Pingback: Curriculum – TPS Research - April 12, 2019

  22. Pingback: Why Classical Education? (redux) – Good Enough Homeschool - June 20, 2019

  23. Pingback: Learning to teach – elements of learning - July 6, 2019

  24. Pingback: A transformative year – elements of learning - July 17, 2019

  25. Pingback: Curriculum Thinking. Blog collection all in one place. | teacherhead - July 17, 2019

  26. Pingback: The Strait and Narrow Way of Curriculum Leadership (2) – Occam's Hairdryer - August 27, 2019

  27. Pingback: Planning an interweaved Key Stage 3 curriculum – RE with Mrs McGee - October 29, 2019

  28. Pingback: Equation-centric physics teaching – why I’m leaving it behind. – elements of learning - October 30, 2019

  29. Pingback: Making knowledge stick – Teaching and Learning - November 29, 2019

  30. Pingback: Educating a burning planet: "21st Century Skills" are not enough – Teach. Think. Blog. - January 16, 2020

  31. Pingback: Mnemonics lack depth for Art – @damoward - February 17, 2020

  32. Pingback: Knowledge-rich: what are we really talking about? – Mr Vallance Teach - March 20, 2021

  33. Pingback: Building a Coherent Curriculum by Reid Smith | failthinklearn - May 3, 2021

  34. Pingback: Shelley Parry’s CogSciSci ‘Bath 2020’ Quick Wins and Slow Gains – CogSciSci - October 30, 2021

  35. Pingback: Curriculum as the driving force – elements of learning - October 30, 2021

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow teacherhead on WordPress.com


Blog Stats

  • 7,346,458 hits


Follow me on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 129,696 other followers

St Jude Songs. And others.

%d bloggers like this: